Home Â» Split-Half Reliability: Definition + Examples

Split-Half Reliability: Definition + Examples

Internal consistencyÂ refers to how well a survey, questionnaire, or test actually measures what you want it to measure. The higher the internal consistency, the more confident you can be that your survey or test is reliable.

One popular way to measure internal consistency is to use split-half reliability, which is a technique that involves the following steps:

1.Â Split a test into two halves. For example, one half may be composed of even-numbered questions while the other half is composed of odd-numbered questions.

2.Â Administer each half to the same individual.

3.Â Repeat for a large group of individuals.

4.Â Find the correlation between the scores for both halves.

The higher the correlation between the two halves, the higher the internal consistency of the test or survey. Ideally you would like the correlation between the halves to be high because this indicates that all parts of the test are contributing equally to what is being measured.

When to Use Split-Half Reliability

The split-half reliability method is an easy method to carry out if you want to measure internal consistency, but it should only be used if the following two conditions are present:

1. The test has a large number of questions. Split-half reliability works best for tests that have a large number of questions (e.g. 100 questions) because the number we calculate for the correlation will be more reliable.

2.Â All of the questions on the test or survey measure the same construct or knowledge area. If a particular test measures several different constructs like leadership skills, communications skills, programming skills, and other professional skills, then a split-half reliability would not be appropriate to use since many of the responses are not expected to be correlated anyway.

Example of Split-Half Reliability

Suppose researchers would like to measure the internal consistency of a particular test that has 100 questions all related to introverted personality traits. They carry out the following steps to measure the split-half reliability of the test.

Step 1.Â Split the test in half based on odd-numbered and even-numbered questions.

Step 2.Â Administer each half of the test to the same individual.

Step 3.Â Repeat for 50 individuals.

Step 4.Â Find the correlation between the scores for both halves.

If the researchers find that the correlation is fairly high, they can be assured that allÂ parts of the test are contributing equally to measuring the introverted personality traits theyâ€™re interested in.

Conversely, if the correlation is low then that could be an indication that the lowly correlated questions need to be either re-written or removed altogether to improved the internal consistency and the overall reliability of the test.